Last week I sat down to write about Godzilla and found that a minor hurdle that I had to enjoying it
was getting past a very mundane plot that occupied the first thirty minutes of
the film. And, like a virus coming
around for a second go at a drained and exhausted human body, X-Men: Days of Future Past took plot
issues to a whole new level and gave me my second assault from within the past
week. If audiences spend the entire film
thinking too much, stocks in Tylenol would see a significant jump as thousands
of movie goers would attempt to quell their brain-drain headaches.
Every movie, especially time travel movies (which this one
is), will have plot holes in it, and action films such as this require an
expected suspension of disbelief. The
issue with this movie is that the suspension of disbelief needed does not come
from having to allow for the fact that there are mutants with crazy powers, but
that everything you have been told from previous X-Men movies may or may not
fit with the tale you are watching. X-Men: First Class was a wonderfully fun
film which had the appearance to be a reboot over a direct prequel, as elements
were introduced that did not fit with the previously established trilogy. That is fine and good, but X-Men: Days of Future Past links the two
together, meaning that all anomalies from the past versions should somehow fit
with the future version, and it is just a mess of mental catastrophe wading
your mind through the maze of inconsistencies.
Let me now pause to enjoy the aforementioned Tylenol…
Alright, I am back on track.
If you were to spend all of the running length of this film straining to
put all of the pieces together of what you are being told by director Bryan
Singer and writer Simon Kinberg then you would miss out on a visually stunning
and fun adventure. I won’t downplay the inconsistency
factor, but the film is good enough that you are able to look past it. If you look at the Batman trilogy by Christopher Nolan you will find a massive amount
of improbabilities and plot holes, but the experience is engrossing enough that
it is easy to pass them by. It is very
similar with X-Men: Days of Future Past,
which relies on a stellar cast of talent playing mutants, all of whom have
their own personal battles that they are trying to get through.
The future of mutants and humans is in jeopardy in the
future, and the X-Men use the powers of Kitty Pryde (Ellen Page) to transport
Wolverine’s (Hugh Jackman) mind into his body in the year 1973. He then must find the young Professor X
(James McAvoy) and his old friend turned enemy, Magneto (Michael Fassbender). Along the way we get to see new mutants and
ones we have already met as they attempt to track down Mystique (Jennifer
Lawrence) whose actions may lead to the bleak future that they are trying to
avoid. It sounds a bit like Terminator, but instead of Kyle Reese
naked and with no weapons landing in the past, we Wolverine, naked and with
temper… this sort of thing bodes well for entertainment.
Just like the first film, I felt the largest strength to be
the performances and relationship between McAvoy and Fassbender, both of whom
play their characters perfectly and exhibit full, powerful emotions, as well as
Fassbender being able to show strength and danger using only facial expressions
an posturing. Magneto really has to be
one of the most cinematic villains in history, because there is so much you can
do with him that creates a sense of awe when seen on the big screen. Bryan Singer crafted numerous magnificent
moments with Magneto that alone are worth seeing the film for.
One aspect that I was very happy with in X-Men: First Class was their use of the F-word. This may sound very silly for me to bring up,
but in a PG-13 movie they are only allowed one use of the word. Just like any other aspect of the visceral and
storytelling experience, language means a lot.
So many times when studios only have one opportunity to use a strong
word that sums up many emotions it is just inserted in a throwaway moment. First
Class used it at an appropriate time, with appropriate characters that
created a great deal of humour, but was so true and sincere to the moment. X-Men:
Days of Future Past ties in its use of the cuss word with the previous
film, not for humour but for an understanding of character. I do applaud them for making the most of the
one shot they had at using that word, because it made an impact in the story.
The action scenes were a visually stimulating experience,
and one in particular included an enormous amount of humour. While it was not an overly funny movie, the
humour fit perfectly with the character and situation involved without being
out of place and overly slap-stick (even though it was rather slap-stick). Once again, Singer showed an awareness of
what works, with whom, and when. One
downside to his choice of visuals was at times inserting grainy perspective
shots from bystanders to the action who had cameras. I do understand that the intent was possibly
to instill the understanding that the mutants were now caught on tape, but it
had a tendency to work against the flow of what was unraveling.
If you are an X-Men fan, or just a fan of solid summer
action flicks, you will most likely get all of your money’s worth out of X-Men: Days of Future Past. Or, if you are like me, you are sitting on a stock pile of Scene points and will have the option of seeing it for free. But, if you completely act like me, you will
not figure out how to redeem the points and, for the second week in a row, pay
full price for a movie you could have gotten for free because you don’t
understand tech. I am not completely
blaming this on Bryan Singer, but I am considering writing a strongly written
letter.
Rating – 3 out of 4 stars
I definitely didn't have the same issues with plot or feeling the inconsistencies jarred the picture any more than most sequels. I also didn't see the pedestrian recording as disjointing the action in anyway. I think this may be one of the most complex and nuanced comic book movies that have come out. The action actually matters here and has consequences rather than just being eye candy. I love that the dialogue scenes and moments that are lighter on action are often the most compelling and important. I wouldn't say the characters in themselves are complicated, but the situations they are thrown in add nuance and work both as a story and allegories. As I mentioned in podcast, I love how there are no villains here and everyone truly believes in their actions. I definitely agree with your assessment of the effectiveness of the humour, and the Quicksilver scene in the kitchen is already an iconic one.
ReplyDelete