Well, I will first off say that there is no point really
discussing plot and character development, because the film takes the bold
approach of ignoring such things. About
halfway through the film, at the precise moment where my brain started hurting,
I realized that I had to just completely abandon any hopes that the story would
be any better than the previous movie, Transformers:
Revenge of The Fallen. While I had
believed that Revenge of The Fallen
had a convoluted story, Dark of the Moon
ups the ante to astronomical proportions, and, in the interest of self-preservation,
it was best that I just left such things alone.
Characters in the film are just set pieces that exist to
spew out expository dialogue and dramatically shout out names of the Transformers
periodically. Sam Witwiky (Shia
LaBeouf), who is supposed to be the main character who we cheer for from the
previous two installments, has now evolved into an entitled jerk who somehow
always seems to get super model girlfriends.
There really is next to nothing likeable about him, and for a lot of the
film I was hoping he was going to get squashed by a bulking Decepticon. I won’t spoil his fate for you, but I will
say that I did not feel properly satisfied by the end.
With no plot or interesting characters, we really ended up
getting what seems to be the typical Michael Bay movie, which is all about
focussing on big effects and big noises.
After an excruciating time watching Revenge
of The Fallen, I was pleasantly surprised to see that this film had left
behind a lot of the infantile humour and tone from its predecessor and seemed
to be a step towards progress. Where my
intelligence and self-respect were under attack while enduring Revenge of The Fallen, I felt free of
such assaults with Dark of the Moon.
That is not to say that it was lacking obnoxious elements
(such as the aforementioned Witwiky) or what seem to be visual favourites of
Bay. It begins to feel impossible that I
will ever see a film of his that does not have a slow motion shot of a person
getting out of a vehicle, a slow motion shot of someone staring at something
with much conviction on their face, and a slow motion shot of a helicopter. It all does begin to feel so redundant and
that we are merely treading over the same ground, time and time again.
I was, however, able to find some level of entertainment in
the movie. Perhaps that was because I
was able to view it as a purely visceral experience without having to grind
through juvenile humour about farts and robotic testicles. The effects in the film where brilliant, and
the flow of them seemed to be cut and inserted into the movie in a more flowing
form that the previous film. What ended
up happening was that I actually enjoyed myself on some level, which I am not
ashamed to admit.
This is the type of movie that I could see a number of
people liking for its action sequences, but as a whole, it still was just not
there for me. While so many elements
were an improvement over the last film, it is still a film that is ultimately
lacking in a well-rounded presentation.
It is never a good sign when I am cheering for the protagonist to be
offed by any means possible, willing to accept anything from giant explosion to
simple food poisoning from cross contamination due an improper kitchen cleaning
regiment. The film succeeded in not
feeling like a complete waste of time, but that is never a shining endorsement.
Rating – 2 out of 4 stars
The Transformers franchise appears to exist for people who are afraid they've lost their five senses and need the pictures to aggressively assault them to get back in working order.
ReplyDeleteSubtlety and Michael Bay are not two things that go hand in hand. I think 'aggressively assault' is a perfect way to summarize what I witnessed in that movie.
ReplyDelete