Back in the summer, August:
Osage County was one of my most anticipated movies of the second half of
2013. With an extremely deep cast, and
being based on a Pulitzer Prize winning play (the screenplay was written by
Tracy Letts, the writer of the play) it really felt like it had a great deal of
potential to really provide a deep and interesting story. The movie is about a very dysfunctional
family, led by the pill-popping, cruel matriarch Violet (Meryl Streep) who is
left alone when her husband disappears, an event that leads to her daughters,
Barbara (Julia Roberts), Karen (Juliette Lewis), and Ivy (Julianne Nicholson)
to come around her and support her.
Well, ‘support’ may not be the best word to use, because, as I had
mentioned, it is a very dysfunctional family and their idea of ‘support’ may be
different that yours or mine.
Holding the film together are some wonderful acting
performances, especially by Streep and Roberts who play characters who are far
from likable. Violet is a very
detestable person, and Streep seems to care not for her own personal vanity and
creating relatable characters, as she just seems to allow herself to perfectly
ruin any moment she may create where she becomes relatable. Her performance in this film is another solid
argument as to why she should be considered the best actor alive today. The character of Barbara is one of the
strongest of the siblings, and perhaps the one who has been most affected by
the parenting flaws of Violet. Roberts
creates her own character, but at the same time it is one that mirrors, perhaps
more subtly at times, Violet.
It would be hard not to as well mention the supporting cast,
which all do so well to bring their characters to life. One that stood out the most to me was Charles
(Chris Cooper) who was married to Violet’s sister, Mattie Fae (Margo
Martindale), and the de facto patriarch of the family. He is able to become the keel of the ship
that is the family and add an element of humanity and moral uprightness that is
missing from so many people, and he does it in a warm, loving, and fatherly
way. Also standing out was Benedict
Cumberbatch, who plays Little Charles (the son of Charles and Mattie Fae) who
is a very sensitive dullard. We have
seen Cumberbatch play some very cerebral and powerful characters this year
(such as Khan in Star Trek: Into Darkness,
and the voice of Smaug in The Hobbit: The
Desolation of Smaug), and it is very interesting to see him in such a
defenseless and powerless role, showing further his acting talents and what his
young career has in store.
While the film was stoutly cast and showed the effects of
family behaviour, it did end up suffering from some core issues that managed to
hold its potential at bay. The film had
some great moments of comedy in it, and others of very sobering reality,
however the lines and transitions between these often felt blurred. While the story worked very well as a play,
it is possible that the movie needed a different screenwriter to better adapt
it to the different medium. As I mentioned
the blurry transitions, this is what kept the film from truly hitting home for
me. It seemed that the change in gears
and pace could happen very quickly and abruptly, causing me to never settling
into one mode for long enough before the next shift happened.
The execution and delivery really did appear to be the
biggest hurdle for the movie, for while the story looked to show the emotional
revelations, development, and even growth within the family, it continually
seemed to fall just short of achieving the desired emotional impact. It really was difficult to feel what I was
supposed to during this film, and that became frustrating because I truly had a
desire to be invested in the characters, but was never able to find that the
moments where they were to be sympathetic ever fully resonated.
The movie lands in that grey area where there are a lot of
reasons to recommend it, such as the casting, the acting, moments of drama and
comedy, but there are equally enough reasons to not recommend it. Being a person who relies mostly on logic and
reasoning, I find that emotion is what is guiding my rating of this movie, or
more accurately, the lack of emotion.
The film should have stirred up a great range of feelings within me, and
ultimately seemed unable to achieve that, mostly due to a jagged
progression. As well, the characters
could have stood to be more relatable for moments to allow us into their world
of pain and emotionally stunted growth.
Rating – 2.5 out of 4 stars
No comments:
Post a Comment