Showing posts with label Emily Browning. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Emily Browning. Show all posts

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Pompeii

Lately I have been really bad at doing this whole 'movie a day' thing.  A large part of that was working with a short story for a contest that had my mind completely bogged down for the last week.  It is not a great reason, or excuse, but I found it very hard to motivate myself to hop onto much else while the deadline for the contest was quickly approaching.  The piece is now completed, printed, and mailed off, so life can continue for me.


Leading up to the release of Pompeii, the trailers showed a movie that felt like Gladiator meets a volcano disaster movie (insert Dante’s Peak or Volcano) with hints of other films in there as well.  After seeing it I can easily confirm that it is exactly what I had expected, to the point of creating some boredom induced nausea, the kind that wants to erupt much in the same way that a digitally animated Mount Vesuvius wants to spew molten death over poor dialogue and an inanely simple love story.  Luckily for me, I was able to leave the theatre with nothing having erupted personally, but many aftershocks of cynicism and apathy were reverberating through my being.

It is not an awful movie.  Not awful to the point of making the audience mad for having their intelligence insulted (although I imagine there may be some people left feeling that way), and not horrible to the point of being laughably funny (there were a few extremely laughable scenes).  The problem with this film was its complete lack of energy and life, as it merely attempted to simply be a rehashing of stories and characters that we feel like we have seen many times before.  As the movie rolled out, my companion at the theatre decided to play a game where he would count the number of original scenes that he saw.  I believe that quest was bailed on, as I asked him how bored he was about halfway through, and he assured me he was not bored at all as his mind was on other more interesting and important things.  Like the poorly digitized bodies in ashes that bookmark the film (seriously, why could they not have simply built props?) this movie felt dead and buried to the point being a long and drawn out funeral service.

Playing the role of the lead was Kit Harrington, who is best known for his work in the popular series Game of Thrones.  Harrington played a slave who was an awesome gladiator, probably on account of his ability to strenuously flex his abdominal muscles in every scene he was in.  Harrington’s character was featured in a scene at the beginning of the movie which reminded me a lot of Conan the Barbarian where his village was overrun and he witnessed an evil man slay his family.  During the battle, he sees a man kicking ass, and I think we were to believe that witnessing this is what enabled him to fight later on in life.  It may not make great sense while you read it, but I am simply describing the schlock that was placed in front of me.  He then meets a prominent lady, played by Emily Browning, and we know that these two hot people are destined to fall in cliché love before running across the path of a dastardly volcano.

Everything that unfolds in this film is incredibly predictable, and it becomes clear as we are introduced to different characters and see developments happen that we will quickly be able to figure out just where the story is going.  It is not aided by scenes being completely lifted out of movies, such as scenes from Gladiator (it really liked stealing from that film), which eventually ground me down to a point of not really caring for any reason at all and found it hard to focus on viewing it from a critical standpoint.  The dialogue, much like the acting, is about as childish and basic as it gets, and the decisions of the characters begin to baffle onlookers who get tired of the fact that people seem to forget there is a volcano erupting and continually deviate from escaping with their lives to carry out pointless actions that serve the weak plot.

I won’t put much blame for this on the actors, but more so on the poor screenplay that was etched by Janet Scott Batchler, Lee Batchler, and Michael  Robert Johnson, which gave none of the talent anything to really work with.  On top of the flaccid story was the directorial work of Paul W.S. Anderson who enjoys a style over substance approach to his films, but seems to fall short in both categories from time to time.  In the case of Pompeii, this is one of those times.  Visually it was not a great movie, except for some of the long distance shots of the exploding mountain near the end of the film, and there was a great use of lackluster CGI for items that could have easily been props or models and ended up looking a lot better.  As well, he really wanted these characters to be as one dimensional as possible, with Harrington only ever delivering lines and emotions of bravery and never actually acting like a real person.

It is unfortunate, because I could go on and on, writing at long lengths different things about this film but it just would not be appropriate because there are so many other things that are better uses of my time.  I have been putting off this review for a number of days because I have been completely uninspired by the film, a movie that is uninspired itself.  It may have the clanging of swords and the ever-so-spectacular moments of people running away from poor special effects on a blue screen, but it has little more to add than just that.  I was bored watching it, and I am kind of bored sitting here writing about it.

Rating – 1.5 out of 4 stars

Friday, November 15, 2013

Sucker Punch

If you were to read my review of Limitless on Wednesday, you may get a slight sense that I do not harbor all of the world's best thoughts and feelings towards Sucker Punch, the 2011 movie directed and co-written by Zack Snyder.  It is about a girl who experiences some pretty severe trauma and is sent to a mental institution.  While there, she works towards an escape plan before her evil stepfather has her lobotomized.

Now, it sounds like there might be some female empowerment in that description, and I fully believe that Snyder was going for a movie about female empowerment.  Unfortunately, when you name your main character 'Babydoll,' you perhaps show a lack of understanding towards the matter of the empowered female.  Yes, I know that this movie is extremely stylized and that the names fit into that structure, but I plan to take a good look at the style used to show just how strong a female can be.

While Babydoll (Emily Browning) is institutionalized, she forms an alternate reality in her mind where she is the new arrival at a brothel (because that is where a woman's imagination would take them, and is not at all just a reflection of the male fantasy of where a woman's mind would escape to), where the other patients are 'dancers' and the staff are mobsters who run the brother.  Babydoll soon realizes that she has a very magical dance that can hypnotize the horny men.  While doing this seductive dance, Babydoll once again forms an alternate reality in her mind where there are always a lot of special effects, swords and explosions.

It is in these scenes of escapism that Zack Snyder goes totally off the rails with the special effects.  Whether she is fighting giant Samurai or battling against the Third Reich in steampunk WWII, it is a non-stop visual ride.  There were some moments where the visuals looked quite nice, but there were other times where the it fell apart and was unable to be consistent.  While some people may enjoy this, I found that it fairly quickly became way too much.  Fight scenes are great and fun, and so are explosions.  But when that's all you have, constantly bombarding you with no real connection to the characters or plot, it can become boring.  This is exacerbated by the fact that all of this action happens in a dream within a dream.  When the action is that detached to reality, it is hard to give a damn.

And this leads back to what I see is the biggest problem of the movie.  The premise seems to be that the strength of the female to overcome the nasty things in the man's world is to imagine they are somewhere else.  Seriously.... that is what this movie says.  That is Snyder's vision of the strong woman... someone who can create an alternate reality because they are too unfit to cope with real life trauma.  So, while we have scenes of Babydoll being brave and taking down mammoth sword fighters, we are also shown that this is the only place where she is strong.

This film, in all reality, is just a male fantasy of what a strong woman is.  She has to retreat into her mind when the men own reality.  She has to be identified by names like Babydoll, Rocket, Sweat Pea, or any of the other names that believe were being used stylistically, but ultimately just show the male fantasy side of this picture.  The strong woman also, while creating an alternate reality for herself, puts herself in a role where she is sexually subservient to men, and dresses in short skirts, short shorts, or any other sexy outfit.  Thank you, Zack Snyder, thank you for showing a generation of young woman that if they are ever treated poorly they can escape in their minds into a more degrading reality, and that is where their power is.

Rating - 1 out of 4 stars

About Me

My photo
I'm smarter than a bat. I know this because I caught the little jerk bat that got in my apartment, before immediately and inadvertently bringing him back in. So maybe I'm not smarter than a bat.