Monday, August 4, 2014

Get On Up

For those who have not yet heard the name Chadwick Boseman and are unaware of the promise that is held by this rising star, Get On Up is the perfect introduction to the skills that he wields.  The film is a biopic about the life and career of James Brown, with Boseman playing the hardest working man in show business.  Last year he took on the mantle of Jackie Robinson in 42, and people may be starting to look to him for more biopics due to the depth of performance he has been able to dish out.

In Get On Up I found myself situated in a two hour and eighteen minute paradox (in perfect honesty, the movie never felt that long).  The contradicting forces within this film came around the pathos, with it being both distancing the audience at arm’s length while also ultimately relying on an emotional connection for us to have with James Brown and his circumstances.

Existing within the performance from Boseman we see a tremendous nuance on display that conveys the emotions of James Brown in scenes of revelation towards inner turmoil.  That is great and intriguing, but the progression of the movie, and the script itself, keeps the film impersonal to show how Brown kept many issues to himself and closed himself off from those closest to him.  However, to properly accomplish this there needs to be elements in the film that lets the audience inside to gain perspective on what lays below his exterior.  This never happens, and the disconnect with James Brown is a barrier that becomes difficult for us to break.  Without context or consequence to the eroding life circumstances of the lead character, the conclusion of the film, one which is designed to show a personal nature, is unable to properly achieve its goals.  

There is one relationship in the film that does feel real and authentic, showing a sincere side to James Brown.  This is between him and his manager, Ben Bart (Dan Aykroyd), who are able to see past the difference in skin colour as well as their business partnership.  Both actors play well with each other, and it becomes both a touching and encouraging angle of the film.  The sad part is that this was not to be the crux relationship of the film, and instead was secondary to everything else.

Playing along with the Oscar worthy (yes, I do believe that his performance was that good) role of Boseman was a wonderful soundtrack that encapsulated so much of the tone and drive of the film.  This is more than a necessary aspect, because to have messed up here would have been a crippling shot to the foot.  The audio is captured to give a live performance vibe that tantalizes the ears and forces foot to tap.  The visuals of the performances, however, were not quite able to keep pace as it never was able to plant the audience within the screaming crowd.  Successful spectacle films are a vehicle to fully transport the audience into another world, to integrate us within the moment and forget that we are sitting in a theatre.

This is a story with a nonlinear narrative, jumping around through different times of the life of James Brown, sometimes chaotic and others feeling organic and well arrived.  It could be an illustration of the drug induced state that James Brown found himself in in the late eighties.  It could also be an attempt to keep the intentional emotional distancing between the audience and the film.  Regardless of director Tate Taylor’s reasoning for it, the format never becomes as much an issue as the lack of understanding and connection to the Godfather of Soul, which keeps this film from truly being great.


Rating - 2.5 out of 4 stars

5 comments:

  1. The biggest disappointment is that with this being a lesser picture may result in Chadwick Boseman being unfairly ignored come Oscar time. Also apparently Dan Aykroyd had a great deal of affection for James Brown and Brown played a big part in helping him with Blues Brothers, so that may have helped in creating the great chemistry.

    ReplyDelete
  2. That is very interesting about Aykroyd and James Brown. It makes sense then as to his involvement with this project. Besides Boseman, who would you say would have the standout lead male roles so far this year?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ralph Fiennes in 'The Grand Budapest Hotel' is probably the next strongest in being remembered at the end of year, especially since he is in a movie that could still have potential to get Best Picture nomination. The only other lead male role that I can think of off the top of my head that could have a outside shot (only based off what I've seen, mind you) would be Russell Crowe from 'Noah'. Of course, I haven't seen either 'Joe' or 'Locke'.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can do nothing but agree with you about Fiennes. He is the first person that comes to mind in that category. Have you heard critics talking about Tom Hardy as an Oscar contender from his role in Locke?

      Delete
  4. Based on the praise for the movie coming from what is described as a "one-man show" in a great performance from Tom Hardy, I'd have to assume he has a strong outside shot with the proper promotion. As far as Oscar contenders, this year doesn't appear to be as strong as the last two, which means better chances for those movies outside of Oscar season. But we'll see, as many of the movies haven't even been screened yet.

    ReplyDelete

About Me

My photo
I'm smarter than a bat. I know this because I caught the little jerk bat that got in my apartment, before immediately and inadvertently bringing him back in. So maybe I'm not smarter than a bat.